| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 |
So, a lot of people seem to be confused about the way the Jesuits could compare against the Jews when it comes to raw wealth so I thought about diving deeper into this subject. There's a reason why they were so feared even by the richest European oligarchs...
It is generally understood that the overall wealth of the Vatican is so great that it's almost impossible to measure. People should understand that the proper historical interpretation is that the Vatican has been controlled by them for hundreds of years.
The reason why the Jesuits were so feared is that they eventually used their influence to take over the most relevant education centers. This way the most powerful European oligarchs were trained under their principles, and even grew to become Jesuits themselves:
"In the subterranean Church of the Gesu is a Congregation of Nobles, in which are assembled all the Roman nobility; the Jesuits are their directors, confessors, and preachers, and by this means they have become masters of the aristocracy. They have in a chapel on the ground floor of the house of the Gesu a Congregation of Merchants, with which almost all the businessmen of Rome are associated; the Jesuits are the confessors, the preachers, and the directors of it, and thus, by means of this Congregation, they not only are enlightened as to all business, but in great measure they direct it.”
There is a a group of Central Banks that are known as The Big Four. These are the biggest and most influential banks in the world. During the time of 2017 to 2019 more or less, the majority of these banks were all controlled by Jesuits students. These positions always keep rotating, but this particular Jesuit formation lasted for a very long time.
The Jesuits literally ran multi-million dollar campaigns to create the false narrative that the Rothschilds control the Vatican and banking when that's not really the case. Now let me remind you, even before the Jesuits were even a thing, it was generally understood that the Vatican and the Pope ran usury and banking and they tended to blame the Jews alone for everything as a favorite tactic. When the Protestants controlled the white nations, it was generally accepted that the Jesuits were the crazy group trying to take over the world.
The Jesuits by principle own the wealth of all Catholics combined. Now, obviously, this doesn't mean that every single Catholic is a bad person working for them. That's obviously not the case. But even if we limit ourselves to the institutions in the government, then Catholics run all the major institutions. Catholics control the CIA. Catholics control the congress by majority. The Federal Reserve is controlled by the Jesuit trained Jerome Powell and last time I checked, the Supreme Court by majority controlled by Catholics and Jesuit students.
So I hope this is a good analysis about how the Jesuits could compare against the Jews when it comes to raw wealth. Since both groups act as political subversives and both groups possess vast wealth, then the most logical reasoning when it comes to comparing their political power is seeing who controls the majority of institutions. The Jesuit superiority is actually obvious, and no one will fool me into thinking that the Jesuits are a group of passive philosemites just because the government gives benefits to Israel. The anti-Semitism of the Jesuits is very well recorded, and those policies can simply be explained away by both groups being corrupt, working together and the Jesuits playing mind games just like usual:
https://scored.co/c/Jesuits/p/1ATVVUW3ev/catholic-records-of-antisemitic-/c
https://TheConsciousResistance.com/pyramid-of-power-must-see/
Wasn't JFK the first Catholic president? Didn't he want to curtail the money printing powers of the Federal Reserve? Perhaps one of the reasons he was killed. Why would a good Catholic like JFK try to reduced the power of a Jesuit central bank?
Everyone gets fixated on a single group controlling everything. And then ends up in debates. I think it's more reasonable to think there is a pluralism of major influences. Saying everything is X or everything is Y fails to see the forest for a single tree.
Sometimes, and often, these groups find alignment. In fact I think that is what happened with JFK. Enough interconnected powerful groups made the collective calculation to get rid of him. But you would think the hold out there would have been the Jesuits. And if so, it means there is enough collective power out there besides the Jesuits to override them.
JFK had as treasury secretary C Douglas Dillon. Jewish republican CIA member. Why would catholic Jesuit democrat jfk choose him. JFK was a puppet as most are but tried to break away.
He's "the jesuits" version of this guy...
https://digitalmomblog.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ancient-alien-meme-example.jpg
There are a lot of different religious orders in the Catholic Church. They make up new religious dogma like kids seeing mother mary or they worship a certain saint. It's all about competition amongst the bishops to get promotions. Sometimes promising to reveal a mystery helps recruitment. Catholic Church is dying tho. Pope Leo is from the order of saint augustine. If any secret society is in charge it's them.
403 forbidden
Ancient forbidden 403.
Justified Mu Mu.
^ This.
So, after the Jesuits defeat the KKK, (the original KKK was anti-Jesuit and it got destroyed by the FBI and the neo-nazi movement) the New York and Chicago Jesuits become the main power players in the US. However, the New York Jesuits represented by people like Allen Dulles, and Roy Cohn felt like FDR and JFK started to lean too much towards the left with their new deal. These right wing Jesuits are represented by more traditional Catholics than their counterparts on the left, so that's why they don't want migration to go overboard and that explains Trump’s policies nowadays. Trump is the apprentice of Roy Cohn. The reason why JFK opposed some policies from the CIA and such is that he wanted the Bahía de Cochinos invasion to succed but Allen Dulles sabotaged it, creating a civil war between these two factions. That's why the Dulles and the Kennedys despise each other you are a fool if you think JFK was a good guy his assassination was a hoax.
So you see, there is a Catholic civil war between these two factions of the Jesuits nowadays. The right-wing represented by Trump are the New York Jesuits that are more traditional and want the country for themselves and the left-leaning Jesuits are should I say more communist? In their policies, but more in the original Jesuit monastic view.
I understand what you are saying when it comes to the different power players being involved and all that but people shouldn't fall into the view that learning the history is meaningless. It's a very anti-intellectual and nihilistic point of view. The people in power don't do things randomly, they have defined philosophical goals. And like I said, the Jesuits ARE responsible for the biggest conflicts in the last 500 years. Either people start taking this piece of history seriously or our nations go to hell...
Roy Cohn Jewish of course. Not Jesuit.
Roy Cohn was an opportunist that was in alligance with the Jesuits of New York of Tammany Hall. There are signs he was even a self-hating Jew.
The only thing Jesuit about him is being gay, like the cathars. Ignatious just copied that gnostic sect. That's why the Catholic Church is so gay now.
Maybe gays just happen.
(((Roy Cohn))) was Ashkenazi from the Bronx.
No one said learning history is meaningless.
We're saying, make it make sense.
Communication takes two - the sender and receiver.
Failure comes from at least one.
That's a huge claim.
We're not convinced because there's no shortage of good evidence that many other groups are ALSO responsible.
You're not making a clear, concise, self-evident, irrefutable case that can not only convince us, but undo all the evidence for other deep state groups' responsibility.
And, ultimately, most importantly, why does it matter that we use this name, not other names for these evil group(s)?
Lastly, I could be wrong - but it seems you have very binary thinking, black or white, on or off, yes or no.
You seem to be saying, "you're all wrong, I'm right."
Perhaps we're not wrong, but you are. Or there might be shades of grey, depending.
Maybe the Jesuits are just one of many groups at the top competing for power while in agreement that the pleb goyim must serve the ruling class.
Dude, in the time period of the Protestant Reformation and counter reformation, the Jesuits murdered 50 million white Protestants. The other most relevant major crisis of all is that of the communist regimes, out of which while the Jews were also involved, the Jesuits manipulated the events from the background to exaggerate the Jewish influence and boost the fascist movements. That's it, those are the two most relevant conflicts in the last 500 years. You don’t have to be a genius to figure this out, this is like 2nd grade history.
Monty Python were funny with their Spanish Inquisition sketches - but that was English propaganda, as the English Reformation was far worse. And Bolsheviks were even more evil. This we know. But I'm not going to claim the English and Spanish were BOTH Jesuits without clear concise compelling evidence - so I'm not going to blame Jesuits, Sabbateans, Zionists, nor Globalists without a case.
For the first few decades of my life I used to believe the official Holocaust narrative - until I finally made time and looked at some "Nazi propaganda". I was already converted but a few years ago I made time for the flawed but excellent "Europa, The Last Battle", which was over a dozen hours, but worth it and should convert anyone with a brain.
You need a documentary or compilation like that, to present the chronology and case for the Jesuit dominance (rather than just Jesuit complicity). Clear concise compelling - or it won't work.
Typing on forums only reaches a very small percent of the population. Basically insignificant.
Incoherently typing (with insults) is like screaming at clouds and you reach no one.
Sadly folks don't read as they do listen/watch videos. This is the modern age.
You need to change course in order to become effective.
Do I have to do everything over here? Seriously dude:
https://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/827989/15116787/1321289366180/50+million+protestants+killed.pdf
And no, I don't intent to use matrix as a media source. It's just a data center to me. I will run my campaigns elsewhere...
If you want to be effective at compelling us to believe in your Jesuit conspiracy analysis, then yes - you do have to do the work. Otherwise you won't be taken seriously. I am trying to help you.
Doesn't say Jesuits.
What is the point of the "campaigns to create the false narrative that the Rothschilds control the Vatican and banking when that's not really the case" when we already know about the Jesuits?
More importantly, why is it so important to understand that the "Jesuits" are at the top rather than the "Globalists", "WASPs", "Zionists", or the FIC, MIC, & TIC, etc.?
What bit of difference does the name mean?
How are their actions different?
How does it matter?
Charlie Robinson (https://www.TheOctopusOfGlobalCControl.com, https://www.MacroAggressions.io/, https://ActivistPost.com/charlie-robinson-takes-over-activist-post/, YT: 2026-09-17 Charlie Robinson - The Octopus of Population Control) says it's two groups - the Zionists and WASPs currently at the top.
Simon Dixon says it's the FIC, MIC, & TIC.
I don't see why it can't be all of them, like overlapping Venn diagrams, as Rhodes developed circles within circles. The more circles you were in the more connected. If you were in the Atlantic Council, fine, but if you're also in the Trilateral Commission, Carlyle Group , etc. etc. etc. like Kissinger was, then you're "more powerful".
Also, why would the Jesuits allow the Jews to pull the Vatican II thing?
My own interpretation, was that Vatican II was an agreement between the two groups. The Jews and the Jesuits are willing to work together if their goals aling. Also, one of the main figures behind Vatican II was the Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin, who is behind the Omega Point which is the end goal of the NWO.
Good lead to follow up on. Thanks.
Might be worth trying to find a short video on this to share.
You have so much Jesuit info, have you ever considered drafting a book and/or documentary on the matter?
Not to sound like a broken record, but you could develop such projects on Projex.Wiki with typical wiki cross referencing as well as more powerful semantic-wiki abilities.
It's a matter of ethics man. While let's say the Protestant patriarchies weren't perfect, the white nations were prospering for hundreds of years and people had a strong ethnic and religious identity and were actually happy. Between the Counter-Reformation and the communist régimes the Jesuits killed at least 100M people, a lot of them white Protestants and are basically responsible for the biggest conflicts in the last 500 years.
Regardless of your moral or political affiliation, if you come from the white nations there is no excuse for you to not know who the Jesuits are. You are basically a complete moral degenerate if you think this history is not relevant. It's to the point that this is one of the main reasons why people overall are so divided into a million different political groups. You are dealing with a bunch of manchilds that don't know crap about history, ethics, theology or philosophy and yet think they are qualified to dictate how others should live their lives. It's downright cringe worthy.
No one said history was not important. Insulting anyone does not help your case. Sober up.
Who's ethics?
Define them.
How are the "degenerate" sects different? - Jesuits from Zionists (with their evil Noahide Laws despite so many atheists), or even thieving lawyers and banksters? They all dictate on their terms to serve their interests.
Factions of "White" and religious folks from the common pleb to the CIA to the Bolsheviks to Banksters to whoever have supported global tyranny and hundreds of millions of murders. Tell me something I don't know without insults.
I'm sorry my guy. But my point still stands. The Jesuits are responsible for the biggest conflicts in the last 500 years. This is extremely relevant information even if you are not white, but it is more important if you are white. None of the modern political groups, not even conspiracy related even know who the Jesuits are whatsover and it's a large part why everyone is so divided. Insulting people is being kind. As far as I'm concerned, even a degree of moderated political violence is justified at this point...
Again, you answered none of the important questions.
Owning a central bank = you have infinite money. Not impossible to measure. Infinity is a measurement.